<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>holgr.com - Latest Comments in Apple&amp;#8217;s iPhone 3G and the ubiquitous internet</title><link>http://holgr.disqus.com/</link><description>Random rants about news, photography, internet, world, life and much more</description><atom:link href="https://holgr.disqus.com/apple8217s_iphone_3g_and_the_ubiquitous_internet/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:54:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Apple&amp;#8217;s iPhone 3G and the ubiquitous internet</title><link>http://holgr.com/blog/2008/06/10/apples-iphone-3g-and-the-ubiquitous-internet/#comment-1363008</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Location-based advertisements are a benign use of tracking data when&lt;br&gt;compared with the possibility of realtime-tracking by the government.&lt;br&gt;Here in the US, AT&amp;amp;T has opened up its pipes to the government for a&lt;br&gt;long time. How easy do you think it'll be for them to track the&lt;br&gt;movements of any iPhone owner, should they choose to do so, now that&lt;br&gt;the GPS chip is in there? It would be a trivial switch in terms of&lt;br&gt;effort.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But really, this applies to just about any phone with a GPS chip out&lt;br&gt;there, not just the iPhone. The funny thing is, if the government had&lt;br&gt;actually tried to get people to carry GPS devices so they could be&lt;br&gt;tracked, they'd have never succeeded. But people have readily adopted&lt;br&gt;them and have opened themselves to that possibility simply because&lt;br&gt;they got some benefits out of it as well. Interesting how that worked,&lt;br&gt;no?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;R.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Raoul Pop</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:54:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>